Toronto Centre Community
  • Home
  • About
    • About the Toronto Centre
    • Our Mission
    • Our Impact
    • Poverty Reduction
    • Training Methodology
    • History
    • Team
    • Partners
    • Policies
  • Programs
    • Our Programs
    • Upcoming Programs
    • Program Objectives
    • Country, International and Regional Programs
    • Programs by Sector
    • Training Topics
    • Master of Finance
    • TC Community
    • Past Programs
  • News
  • Jobs
  • Contact
  • Resources
  • Resources  

  • Clear Search
  • Advanced search
  • 382 records

No records

Policy Measures to Address Systemically Important Financial Institutions

FSB policy document setting out critical policy measures that form parts of the FSB SIFI Framework

Financial Stability Board policy document with specific measures that focus on global SIFIs (G-SIFIs) to reflect the greater risks that these institutions pose to the global financial system. The policy measures announced today comprise: i) a new international standard as a point of reference for reforms of national resolution regimes, to strengthen authorities’ powers to resolve failing financial firms in an orderly manner and without exposing the taxpayer to the risk of loss; ii) requirements for resolvability assessments, recovery and resolution plans and institution-specific cross-border cooperation agreements for G-SIFIs; iii) requirements for additional loss absorption capacity above the Basel III minimum for global systemically important banks; and iv) more intensive and effective supervision through stronger supervisory mandates, and higher supervisory expectations for risk management functions, risk data aggregation capabilities, risk governance and internal controls.

Publisher: Global Standard-Setting Bodies     Release date: Nov 2011    

Type: Law, Regulation and Policy

Peer: 2017 Update of List of Global Systemically Important Banks (G-SIBs)

Topics: Systemically important financial institutions (SIFIs), Risk management, Crisis management and contingency planning, Recovery and resolution

Sectors: Banking, Insurance

The Financial Crisis Inquiry Report

US government analysis of causes of the financial crisis of 2007-2009

Final report of the US National Commission on the Causes of the Financial and Economic Crisis in the United States. Examines in detail the causes of the global financial crisis.

Publisher: National Government     Release date: Jan 2011     Country: United States

Type: Consultative, discussion and issues paper

Topics: Crisis management and contingency planning, Systemic risk

Sectors: Banking

HKMA Supervisory Policy - General Risk Management Controls

HKMA guideline on general controls banks are to have in place in their risk management systems

Hong Kong Monetary Authority statutory guideline covers general systems and controls relating to risk management. Stresses importance of each bank having a sound firm-wide risk management framework that enables it to set its appetite and tolerance for risks, and to support board and senior management in managing risks from an integrated, firm-wide perspective and in identifying and reacting to emerging and growing risks in a timely and effective manner.

Publisher: National Regulators     Release date: Dec 2010     Country: Hong Kong, China

Type: Guideline

Peer: HKMA Supervisory Policy - Stress-Testing

Topics: Risk management, Compliance function, Crisis management and contingency planning

Sectors: Banking

Reducing the Moral Hazard Posed by SIFIs

FSB policy framework for addressing the systemic and moral hazard risks associated with systemically important financial institutions (SIFIs)

Financial Stability Board recommendations for improving authorities' ability to resolve SIFIs in an orderly manner without exposing tax-payers to loss and while maintaining continuity of vital economic functions. Requires changes to national resolution regimes, including to enable resolution authorities to coordinate in cross-border resolutions. Recommends that G-SIFIs, financial institutions that are globally systemic, have higher loss-absorbency capacity than Basel III minimum levels and be subject to more intensive supervision and resolution planning to reduce the probability and impact of failure.

Publisher: Global Standard-Setting Bodies     Release date: Oct 2010    

Type: Standard

Parent: Global Systemically Important Insurers (G-SIIs) and the Policy Measures That Will Apply to Them

Peer: Guidance on Supervisory Interaction With Financial Institutions on Risk Culture

Topics: Systemically important financial institutions (SIFIs), Recovery and resolution, Capital adequacy, Supervisory framework, Crisis management and contingency planning

Sectors: Banking, Insurance, Securities

A Framework for Assessing Systemic Risk

WB proposal for a systemic risk assessment framework

World Bank Policy Research Working Paper proposing a simple analytical framework that can be used by authorities with financial crisis management responsibilities in times of crisis to assess the extent to which a particular crisis situation poses systemic risk that might justify use of public resources.

Publisher: International Organizations     Release date: Dec 2009    

Type: Consultative, discussion and issues paper

Topics: Deposit insurance, Liquidity risk and rules, Supervisory structures, Systemic risk, Crisis management and contingency planning

Sectors: Banking

Trust Less, Verify More

WB note on financial supervision in the wake of the 2007-2008 financial crisis

Word Bank note advocates changes in financial supervision in response to causes of the financial crisis and regulatory proposals arising from it. Recommends supervisors adopt tougher and more challenging approach to firms they regulate, exercise more supervisory judgment, involve themselves in macroprudential oversight, and participate more actively in supervision of firms with cross-border activities. 

Publisher: International Organizations     Release date: Jul 2009    

Type: Consultative, discussion and issues paper

Topics: Crisis management and contingency planning, Macroprudential, Recovery and resolution

Sectors: Banking

Is There a Need to Rethink the Supervisory Process?

WB discussion paper examining recent supervisory failings and recommending approaches to strengthen the effectiveness of supervision

World Bank paper discussing the reasons that regulation and supervision has proven ineffective in a number of countries, including a failure of supervisors to understand the business models of supervised institutions and the nature and extent of risk-taking that was occurring, and thus a failure to take appropriate remedial actions, such as forcing institutions to curb risky practices and increase capital requirements and loss provisions. Advocates a more proactive, interventionist supervisory approach with a strong on-site component, in order to understand the risks institutions are taking and to take appropriate actions when the risks are not properly managed.

Publisher: International Organizations     Release date: Jun 2009    

Type: Consultative, discussion and issues paper

Topics: Supervisory framework, Crisis management and contingency planning, Early intervention and enforcement

Sectors: Banking, Insurance, Securities

Principles for Cross-border Cooperation on Crisis Management

FSF high-level principles for managing and resolving financial crises

Financial Stability Forum (now Financial Stability Board) principles for relevant authorities, including supervisory agencies, central banks and finance ministries, to cooperate in making advanced preparations for dealing with financial crises and in managing them.

Publisher: Others     Release date: Apr 2009    

Type: Guideline

Topics: Recovery and resolution, Crisis management and contingency planning, Cross-border cooperation

Sectors: Banking

Guidance on Information Sharing

IOSCO guidance on information sharing during periods of crisis

International Organization of Securities Commissions guidance to authorities on sharing information during periods of market and/or firm crisis by: i) identifying in advance types of core information which market authorities would need to be able to obtain and be prepared to share in order to assist in assessing and managing impact of market and/or firm crisis; ii) explaining relevancy of information; and iii) providing illustrations of types of questions which market authorities may use to request information from another authority. Identifies three generic types of market and/or firm events: i) Type I (firm financial crisis); ii) Type II (market-wide volatility); and iii) Type III (unusual price movements or market volatility in a particular security or derivative).

Publisher: Global Standard-Setting Bodies     Release date: Oct 1997    

Type: Guideline

Topics: Crisis management and contingency planning, Cross-border cooperation

Sectors: Securities

Page 10 of 10 Total: 99
  • Start
  • Prev
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • Next
  • End
  • You are here:  
  • Home
  • Crisis management and contingency planning

Browse by Category

TC Notes

  • TC Notes

Sector

  • Banking
  • Insurance
  • Microfinance
  • Microinsurance
  • Pensions
  • Securities

Topic

  • Accounting, actuarial and auditing
  • Asset classification and provisioning
  • Capital adequacy
  • Climate change
  • Compliance function
  • Conduct
  • Consolidated supervision
  • Consumer education and protection
  • Corporate governance
  • COVID-19
  • Credit risk
  • Crisis management and contingency planning
  • Cross-border cooperation
  • Cyber risk
  • Deposit insurance
  • Derivatives
  • Early intervention and enforcement
  • Financial conglomerates
  • Financial inclusion
  • Financial market infrastructure
  • FinTech
  • Foreign exchange rate risk
  • Gender equality
  • Implementing change
  • Interest rate risk
  • Islamic finance
  • Licensing
  • Liquidity risk and rules
  • Macroprudential
  • Market risk
  • Money laundering and terrorist financing
  • Operational risk
  • Pension and retirement plans
  • Policyholder protection plans
  • Recovery and resolution
  • Risk-based supervision
  • Risk management
  • Securitization
  • Shadow banking
  • Stress-testing
  • Supervisory framework
  • Supervisory structures
  • Systemic risk
  • Systemically important financial institutions (SIFIs)
  • Transparency and disclosure

Country

  • Australia
  • Bangladesh
  • Bermuda
  • Colombia
  • Canada
  • China
  • Denmark
  • Germany
  • Hong Kong, China
  • India
  • Ireland
  • Kenya
  • Malaysia
  • Mongolia
  • Netherlands
  • Nigeria
  • Singapore
  • Sweden
  • Tanzania
  • United Kingdom
  • United States

Resource Type

  • Standard
  • Guideline
  • Sound Practice
  • Consultative, discussion and issues paper
  • Implementation
  • Law, Regulation and Policy
  • Supervisory Practice
  • Others
  • TC Notes
  • TC Videos

Year Released

  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1994
  • 1989

Publisher Type

  • Global Standard-Setting Bodies
  • Regional Standard-Setting Bodies
  • International Organizations
  • National Government
  • National Regulators
  • Subnational Regulators
  • Industry Groups
  • Others
  • Toronto Centre
Clear Search

 

 

 

Contact Us

Back to Top

© 2022 Toronto Centre Community